PAKATAN SLIM CHANCE OR NO CHANCE AT ALL?

Absorb this til the next 5 years

 

It is clearly stated that in Article 118 of  Federal Constitution that no election to the Dewan Rakyat or State Assembly shall be called in question except by way of an election petition to be entered into the High Court having jurisdiction where the election was held. This is has been confirmed by constitutional law expert Syahredzan Johan.

Therefore, Pakatan Rakyat's (PR) bid to ask the High Court to nullify the results of the 13th general election may not succeed, with one calling it a long shot and another describing it as a last resort by the opposition pact to gain power.

In investment, a long short equity hedge fund is usually considered to be higher risk. Thats investment but are opposition allies risking their morale to their supporters over recent General Election dispute?

Further, according to Syahredzan Johan, the application's success or failure depends entirely on how the courts would view it, as the means to challenge election results are clearly laid down in Article 118 of the Federal Constitution that requires an election petition and this would require petitions in every constituency.

Election petition in every constituency? 

Another risk! Pakatan is challenging the entire election and not individual seats. Would Teresa Kok, Seng Giaw, Kit Siang, Guan Eng, Anwar, Rafizi who claimed to win by popular votes and now they would declare its a default and lodge petition against their victory? Only fools would even think about it.

Pay attention to this... Syahredzan Johan said that if he was acting for the Election Commission, he would argue that the opposition MPs accepted the election results when they took their oath as MPs. Not only that, Anwar has agreed to be Head of Opposition and if we may recall... despite their calling off to sabotage, did any oppostion MPs failed to appear during the Dewan Swear In session? No!

All the 222 MPs must be sworn in on the first day of the first session of the 13th Parliament on June 24 or they will be prohibited from attending the Dewan Rakyat sittings and become "strangers of the House", Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia said. - NST

Therefore, all rushed in... and all by moral, technical and constitution accepted GE13 result and this is why Pakatan's effort to bid it as null n void... A WASTE OF BREATH!

And until the next 5 years, Pakatan will be biting their nails once again when BN lead by DS Najib rule Malaysia for a fact.

They are still the CHAMPION

 

BLACK 505 - JAWAPANNYA... BORING!!!

Pemimpin-pemimpin Pakatan telah menjangkakan lautan rakyat yang lebih besar untuk hadir Perhimpunan Black 505 semalam berbanding dengan perhimpunan Bersih 3.0 tahun lepas. Ini juga diyakini pemimpin-pemimpin pembangkang apabila beberapa siri perhimpunan selepas PRU13 pada 8 Mei lalu di Stadium Kelana Jaya, mereka berjaya menghimpunkan lebih 100,000 rakyat.

Seperti yang dilaungkan bahawa Black 505 di Padang Merbok sebagai kemuncak atau "Mother of all Protest" Pakatan Pembangkang terhadap PRU13 dan SPR sehingga penganjur Black 505 telah menganggarkan lebih 300,000 akan memenuhi Padang Merbok semalam.

Tetapi apa yang berlaku, dianggarkan hanya tidak melebih 15,000 yang hadir untuk berkumpul di Padang Merbok

Sekitar waktu 12.00 - 1.00 tengahari

Di Sogo

Di Brickfields

Di Padang Merbok

Sekitar waktu 2.00 tengahari di Padang Merbok

Akhirnya, ketika Anwar sedang bercakap;

Malahan, perhimpunan pertama yang telah diadakan sebelum ini pada 8 Mei lalu di Stadium Kelana Jaya, jauh lebih ramai yang hadir.

APA YANG TELAH BERLAKU?

Kedengaran, ramai yang telah meninggalkan Padang Merbok lebih awal dan tidak menunggu ucapan Anwar. Ini adalah kerana setelah menunggu beberapa minit sebelum ucapan Anwar, ramai pemimpin-pemimpin pembangkang telah berucap sungguh membosankan dan isunya sama seperti mereka pernah didengar berkali-kali. 

Pemimpin-pemimpin pembangkang sekadar mengutuk BN, menuduh PRU13 tidak adil dan bersih, undi popular serta tuntutan perletakan jawatan Pengerusi dan Timbalan Pengerusi SPR.

Ada di antara yang hadir telah boleh membaca apa yang Anwar akan cakap sehingga ada antara mereka tidak mampu menunggu lebih lama lagi. Dan ada pula yang tidak puas hati apabila beranggapan perhimpunan Black 505 bukanlah untuk menyelesai kehendak rakyat tetapi sekadar ceramah politik yang diulangi.  Yang paling malang ada yang menyatakan ia hanya membuang masa untuk berada lebih lama di Padang Merbok.

Kebanyakan penyokong pembangkang bukanlah terlalu bodoh untuk mengetahui perhimpunan di Padang Merbok adalah usaha terakhir Anwar memenuhi janji-janji Pakatan Rakyat untuk menumbangkan BN tetapi telah gagal.

Maka dengan pantas Pakatan memberi alasan . Anwar telah menyalahkan keadaan jerebu yang menyebabkan kegagalan lebih ramai rakyat tidak hadir. Semua maklum bahawa keadaan jerebu telah berlaku beberapa hari sebelum perhimpunan dan pihak berkuasa juga telah menasihatkan
agar ditunda atau diadakan di kawasan tertutup, namun Anwar berdegil untuk meneruskan kehendak beliau diadakan di kawasan terbuka kerana dakwaannya ratusan ribu penyokong pasti hadir.

Anwar juga tidak berjaya mengaitkan alasan tindakan ganas polis apabila pihak berkuasa ini hanya mengawal keadaan trafik dan memastikan keadaan lalulintas berjalan lancar.

APA SETERUSNYA?

Sandiwara pembangkang terutamanya Anwar mesti dihentikan segera. Bukan sahaja membuang masa tetapi tuduhan palsu terhadap SPR akan terbukti apabila akhirnya Anwar dan Ahli-Ahli Parlimen Pembangkang akan turut serta mengangkat sumpah esok hari di mana Anwar akan dilantik
sebagai Ketua Pembangkang.

Maka apabila Anwar dan Ahli-Ahli Parlimen Pembangkang telah mengangkat sumpah, mereka sendiri telah membuktikan dakwaan mereka terhadap SPR sekali gus telah tidak berjaya dan sememangnya palsu. Berakhirlah sandiwara Anwar dengan kegagalannya untuk mengumpul sokongan popular di Padang Merbok dan rakyat perlu fikir untuk tidak melayan sandiwara seterusnya.

KINI, SEKALI LAGI SATU KEGAGALAN SANDIWARA SEORANG LELAKI TUA BERNAMA ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM DAN IA MESTI BERAKHIR.

WU YUE WU, HUAN ZHENG FU... BUKTI CINA INGIN RAMPAS KUASA MELAYU

Mesej jelas dari DAP

Seorang penganalisis politik, Prof Dr Hoo Ke Ping menggariskan lima sebab mengapa kaum Cina menolak MCA dan GERAKAN pada Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 (PRU-13)...

Sebab utama ialah mereka terpengaruh dengan slogan DAP iaitu ‘Wu Yue Wu, Huan Zheng Fu’ (Lima Hari Bulan Lima, Tukar Kerajaan), sekali gus mengakibatkan ‘tsunami kaum Cina’. 

Faktor kedua ialah PAS yang turut memberi tumpuan kepada pengundi Cina sehingga sesetengah pemimpin kanannya sanggup menggugurkan tuntutan negara Islam dan hukum hudud yang diperjuangkan mereka selama ini. 

"Kempen dan strategi parti berorientasikan kaum Cina iaitu MCA dan GERAKAN dilihat sangat tradisional dan kolot. Saya pernah memberi taklimat kepada Jawatankuasa Pusat MCA dan GERAKAN supaya melawan pembangkang habis-habisan, tetapi mereka tidak mahu," Prof Dr Hoo Ke Ping, penganalisis politik... "

Ketiga, kaum Cina mempunyai aspirasi tinggi untuk memegang kuasa dan ia boleh dilihat apabila BN tumbang seperti di Pulau Pinang dan Selangor.

Keempat, pemimpin kanan DAP seperti Penasihatnya, Lim Kit Siang dan anaknya yang juga Setiausaha Agung DAP, Lim Guan Eng memainkan sentimen perkauman untuk mendapatkan sokongan kaum Cina.

Kelima, kempen dan strategi parti berorientasikan kaum Cina iaitu MCA dan GERAKAN dilihat sangat tradisional dan kolot. Saya pernah memberi taklimat kepada Jawatankuasa Pusat MCA dan GERAKAN supaya melawan pembangkang habis-habisan, tetapi mereka tidak mahu.

Pada PRU-13 kelmarin, MCA memenangi tujuh kerusi Parlimen daripada 37 kerusi yang ditandinginya, dan hanya 11 kerusi Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) daripada 90 kerusi DUN yang ditandingi.
Pada 2008, MCA memenangi 15 kerusi Parlimen dan 32 kerusi DUN.

MCA perlu lakukan pembaharuan

GERAKAN pula hanya memenangi satu kerusi Parlimen, Simpang Renggam, daripada 11 kerusi diperuntukkan, dan tiga kerusi DUN iaitu Pemanis, Johor; Tanjong Papat dan Elopura, Sabah daripada 31 kerusi ditandingi.

Mengenai masa depan MCA, Ke Ping berkata, parti itu perlu melakukan pelbagai pembaharuan, termasuk merombak kepemimpinan untuk terus kekal relevan dalam politik negara ini.

Bagi GERAKAN, secara peribadi saya berpendapat parti itu sudah tidak boleh hidup lagi kerana dua kali kalah teruk dalam pilihan raya umum, selain tidak mempunyai hala tuju dan kepemimpinan yang agresif.

PUNAHSIHAT BANGSAWAN ...

PRU 13 telah berlalu lebih sebulan dan kajian demi kajian telah dilakukan oleh pelbagai lapisan rakyat samada dari pihak penyokong atau pihak lawan. Fokusnya adalah lebih kepada mengapa keputusan tidak memihak kepada mereka.

Perkataan yang pertama saya keluarkan setelah diumumkan keputusan penuh PRU 13 ialah "Najib menang tidak bermaruah".

Mungkin ada yang tidak akan bersetuju tetapi pada hakikatnya, mereka sedang memujuk diri masing-masing untuk menerima keputusan yang tidak diharapkan langsung. Komen saya, Najib menang tidak bermaruah adalah kerana apabila melihat keputusan yang memalukan untuk menakluk semula Selangor. Kekalahan ini bukan saja sekadar kalah tetapi prestasi yang sangat-sangat mengecewakan.

DS Najib adalah pengerusi BN Selangor dan apabila majoriti rakyat dengan peratus yang sangat tinggi menolak BN, ini dengan secara langsung memberi mesej, Najib tidak diterima di mana ia memimpin. 

Mengapa begitu? Mana-mana rakyat pun tidak akan menafikan tumpuan kempen yang luar biasa diberikan Najib kepada Selangor melebihi mana-mana negeri sehingga tidak pernah terjadi dalam sejarah pilihanraya Malaysia, lagu negeri berkumandang di kaca televisyen setiap hari dan hampir setiapa waktu.

Kegagalan Selangor perbaiki prestasi mereka malahan ia lebih teruk daripada prestasi 2008, merupakan satu sumbangan besar kepada kegagalan BN sekali lagi untuk mendapat majoriti 2/3. DS Najb bukan sekadar pengerusi BN Selangor tetapi beliau adalah Pengerusi BN Malaysia dan seterusnya Presiden UMNO.

Persoalannya... SIAPA HULUBALANG-HULUBALANG YANG TELAH MENGGAGALKAN NAJIB? Apabila hari demi hari rakyat membuat analisa, punca kegagalan strategi sebenar ialah CALON yang diletakkan. Sekali lagi, siapa yang mencaturkan calon-calon ini? Rupa-rupanya Najib dikelilingi oleh para bangsawan-bangsawan seperti di bawah ini;

Masih ingat apa yang pernah Tun Daim katakan? Antaranya ialah :

 “Saya rasa Zain adalah pilihan yang salah. Dia digugurkan dari Kabinet oleh Najib kerana jelas dia tidak memikirkan beliau berkebolehan dan kemudian lantik dia sebagai setiausaha Umno Selangor. Saya tidak faham logik Najib,” kata Daim 

Komen dari SINI... pula

 

PM dikelilingi oleh orang-orang yang dibenci rakyat - Omar Ong, Idris Jala PEMANDU, Azman Mokhtar KHAZANAH, Nor Md Yakcop KHAZANAH, Hishamuddin Hussein dan lain-lain mangkuk-hayun yang tidak tahu menahu tentang kesusahan hidup rakyat - termasuklah adiknya Nazir Razak.

 

Dan yang membuat Najib tertipu oleh si Cina ini dengan menjual "I LOVE PM" ...

 

Omar Ong

 .... dan apa mesej Omar Ong kepada Anwar;

 

 

Saya ingin bertanaya, adilkah Najib menerima kekalahan yang memalukan ini seorang diri atau memang sepatutnya Najib memikul tanggungjawab ini seorang diri?

Sebelum langkah seterusnya diambil oleh ahli-ahli UMNO .... renungkan pesanan YABhg Tun Mahathir yang saya sendiri saksikan khas untuk DS Najib;

DENGARLAH SIKIT... NASIHAT ORANG TUA-TUA!

REALITY BITES ... BARE THE CONSEQUENSCES FOR BEING RACIST

The Chinese must bare the consequences of Malay backlash.... Reality Bites!

Read Article 153 please...

Dont blame Datuk Mohd Noor Abdullah for speaking the truth... you asked for it Chinese! You rocked the Malay boat in their own homeland so once again, bare the consequences of Malay backlash.

"RACIAL-BOYCOTT" ... CHINESE WENT AMOK

The Malay and Chinese Chambers of Commerce representative, Yeah Kim Leng yesterday told the Malaysian Insider that the ‘racial boycott’ promoted by the ‘pro-UMNO bloggers’ is going to ‘hurt’ the Malaysian economy and ‘frightened’ the investors away.  

He is obviously talking about the the call for boycott all Chinese pro-DAP products by the Malays, which is now going viral.

We could call it a ‘side-effect’ from the GE-13 result that witnessed a total rejection of the Chinese towards the ruling party a.k.a the Malay-led government. Yeah urges Putrajaya to intervene in order to stop the boycott.

I am sure that Yeah is well aware that the Malays have been putting up with the racist game played by Chinese newspapers and the ‘over-reacting’ of the Chinese on racial issues for so long, hoping that the Chinese would one day appreciate their tolerance.

However, the Chinese took the tolerance as an ego-booster. The arrogance that the Chinese once displayed during the 13th May tragedy was again displayed throughout the GE-13 campaigns.

The truth is, the majority is sick over the ‘hypocritical-sensitivity’ of the Chinese. Every time they are reminded of the social contract, they would retaliate by shouting ‘racist’! Every time they are questioned of their nationalism and patriotism, they would bark ‘racist’! And when Utusan Malaysia asked them about what more do they want, which is an innocent, direct, simple question, the paper is condemned as ‘ultra-racist’!

On the other hand, the Chinese newspapers and politicians keep playing the racist card real hard that it comes to the point where the Chinese community failed to differentiate between ‘hate Malays and hate Malaysia’. And today we see their kids took pictures holding the Malaysia flag upside down - and proud of it.

After the GE-13, these racist Chinese extremists finally meet their par. Many Malay teachers and students in Chinese schools started speaking out of their experience in encountering racism in their schools. And many more started to question the role the Chinese newspapers have been playing all along in inciting prejudice, doubts and hatred towards the Malay-led government. The Malay politicians too, are fed-up the Chinese hypocrisy.

It’s now time to lay the racist card for everybody to see. As I have always said to my friends, when you deal with a racist, you have no choice but to be a racist or you will be oppressed. And the Chinese has always been wanting to do that to others – ‘oppress’.

The Malays have had enough of the Chinese chauvinism and arrogance, and so they say: “If you want to play racism, let’s play it”.

One might think that this is how the ‘racial boycott’ started.

In actual fact, it has started long ago when the Chinese slyly attacked and sabotaged all bumi products.

One example, when a Malay tycoon bought over Gardenia Bakeries (KL) Sdn Bhd a few years ago over the worries of ‘halal’ status of the flour supply which has all the while being a Chinese tycoon monopoly, the Chinese community waited no time to launch a boycott over all Gardenia products.

Their excuse? It’s an UMNO-crony’s company.

This is a typical racist way of thinking; that it is okay for the Chinese to practice monopoly but it is never okay for a Malay to break the monopoly and provide a healthy competition because that would be cronysm. Unless, the competitor is a Chinese too, then it should be okay. As Yeah put it, it’s ‘unhealthy, childish and racist’ for the Malay to boycott Chinese products but it is ‘consumers’ rights’ for the Chinese to boycott Malay products.

It is also a well-known secret of how the Chinese play their racist cards in hiring people in the private sectors, that is by stating ‘mandarin’ as a requirement in the job advertisements. Up north, the racist card is often played out in the open where Chinese-owned organizations would not give an equal chance for the Malays to ‘grow’ in the company. Some even blatantly impose a double-standard salary scheme for different races under an ‘unwritten company procedure’ - of course.

And all the while, the Chinese is as arrogant as ever, telling the others that there is nothing they can do as the Chinese controls the economy.

May be it’s true that there is nothing others can do and that this boycott Chinese products will not get the Malays anywhere.

And so, if it’s true, we believe that there is no need for Yeah Kim Leng to be worried. Never mind the country’s economy, as the Chinese will not be affected. After all, it’s the Chinese that he is so concerned about, isn’t he?

The Chinese has stated that they don’t need others, so others have to ‘learn’ to live without the Chinese. And the learning starts now, through ‘boycott Chinese products’.

Please remember too - The Malays are the buying power and you ask for it, Chinese!

CHINESE 1ST... MALAYSIAN NEVER!

Finally, this proves what I blogged previously... 

All answers are here:

1.  THE BASTARD CHINESE... ‘Chinese 1st, Malaysia last' ... HERE

2. ONLY CHINESE ARE AGAINST CORRUPTION... Really??? ... HERE

SPR : DAKWAT KEKAL, BLACKOUT, BANGLA ...

KENYATAAN MEDIA SURUHANJAYA PILIHAN RAYA MALAYSIA

1. Sebagai maklumat  tambahan untuk mengelakkan percubaan mengundi lebih daripada sekali oleh seorang pengundi, Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) telah menggunakan dakwat kekal dalam proses pengundian pada Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 (PRU Ke-13).  Walau bagaimanapun, penggunaan dakwat kekal itu telah menimbulkan pelbagai reaksi daripada parti politik, calon dan pengundi bahawa dakwat kekal itu tidak kekal lama melekat di jari pengundi.

2. Berdasarkan pengalaman pertama itu, SPR  yang mengadakan Mesyuarat SPR pada hari ini,  21 Mei 2013 telah memutuskan untuk menubuhkan satu Pasukan Khas Menyemak Masalah-Masalah Penggunaan Dakwat Kekal PRU Ke-13 untuk meneliti hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan dakwat kekal itu.  Di antaranya berkaitan aspek ramuan, syarat-syarat yang ditetapkan oleh Kementerian Kesihatan, cara penggunaan dakwat kekal, kaedah calitan dakwat kekal di jari dan hasil ujian-ujian yang telah dibuat sebelum dihantar ke Malaysia dan selepas dakwat  itu sampai di Malaysia.  SPR berharap, dengan penubuhan pasukan khas ini, ia akan dapat membantu SPR mengenalpasti perkara-perkara yang menyebabkan  dakwat itu tidak kekal lama di jari setelah dicalit. Tempoh Pasukan Khas itu menyiapkan penyiasatannya dalam tempoh satu bulan.

3. SPR juga memandang serius perbuatan pihak-pihak tertentu yang telah menyebarkan rakaman video, tulisan dan gambar melalui laman sosial, media cetak dan portal berita berhubung dengan tuduhan dan dakwaan yang tidak berasas mengenai SPR.  Di antara tuduhan dan dakwaan itu adalah seperti yang berikut:

(a)   warganegara asing mengundi dalam PRU Ke-13;

(b)   kejadian lampu padam semasa pengiraan undi;

(c)  berlaku tiga tong undi hilang di pusat penjumlahan rasmi undi di Putrajaya;

(d)  peti undi diturunkan dari helikopter dengan tujuan memenangkan pihak yang tertentu;

(e) kenderaan SPR membawa peti undi ke pusat penjumlahan rasmi undi dengan tujuan untuk memanipulasi keputusan pengundian;

(f)  petugas SPR meminta agen calon menandatangani Borang 14 sebelum tamat proses pengiraan undi;

(g)  terdapat pengundi hantu yang mengundi dalam PRU Ke-13; dan

(h)  pengundi dari Sabah dan Sarawak  diangkut dan dihantar untuk mengundi di beberapa negeri.

4. SPR mendapati semua tuduhan dan dakwaan itu adalah tidak berasas, tidak benar dan  boleh mengelirukan rakyat  serta mendatangkan ketidaktentuan dalam negara.  Satu laporan Polis telah dibuat oleh Setiausaha SPR, Datuk Kamaruddin Mohamed Baria pada 16 April 2013  bagi menjaga nama baik  dan integriti SPR sebagai sebuah badan bebas yang ditubuhkan di bawah Perlembagaan Persekutuan untuk menjalankan pilihan raya. Salinan laporan Polis disertakan.

5. SPR akan meneruskan sesi penerangan dan penjelasan berhubung isu-isu PRU Ke-13 bagi memberikan maklumat dan fakta yang tepat kepada orang ramai melalui pelbagai kaedah termasuk melalui media massa.  SPR juga menasihatkan orang ramai supaya menapis maklumat-maklumat yang dibaca terutamanya dari media sosial. Jika perlu, orang ramai boleh menghubungi SPR bagi mendapatkan maklumat yang sahih berkaitan sesuatu isu itu.

Sekian dan terima kasih.

…………….t.t………………

(TAN SRI DATO' SERI ABDUL AZIZ BIN MOHD YUSOF)

Pengerusi

Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya Malaysia

21 Mei 2013

mantra:

1.  Ong Kia Meng, DAP MP of Serdang had used Chua as an

 example of foreigners being given Malaysian identity cards

 - The Star

2. Nurul Izzah dan Tian Chua - dakwat tidak kekal ditunjuk pada pukul 7.55 pagi?

Dan Nurul Izzah ada cara untuk menghilangkan dakwat kekal, saksikan DI SINI

3. DAP rancang operasi 'blackout' PRU13 .... di SINI

4. Semua bukti untuk SPR ambil tindakan ada di SINI...

5. Google search saja penipuan demi penipuan Pakatan Rakyat!

ONLY CHINESE ARE AGAINST CORRUPTION... Really???

Don’t let the bastards grind you down...

The latest Chinese Tsunami in GE13, as labelled by some quarters have thrown to some conclusions by the Chinese themselves. 10 out of 10 would yield to agree that they voted the oppositions because they want "CHANGE" for better Malaysia thats free from corruption.

Really? Think the world would buy that?

Well, the Chinese bought them from the oppositions and believed they are the only species in this world that they are not corrupted and holier than thou among other races.

Earlier in my posting, The World Value Survey has proven that Chinese are the most racist species in the world, to the extend  they abstain neighbouring other races. It does not stop there, Chinese also prefers to segregate their children away from other races through Vernacular School. This is enough to proof that Chinese do not tolerate, refuse to interact as well as reject any form of unity with other races.

They even accuse the government as racist if projects are awarded to Malay companies, even though their race did get fair share for those projects. The ugly side of this race is that they often shout for healthy competition, but at the same time they would criticize anything that leads towards healthy competition. This show that they are not just racist, but hypocrite and oppressor as well.

Yes there is corruption in this country - especially among the politicians.  But what I am really perplexed is if you are against corruption then why did you vote for the corrupt? This has been written in depth by blogger Out Syed The Box, answering  .... READ HERE

If the Chinese community is so against corruption, then why do you vote for such a person like Anwar Ibrahim? The same goes for Azmin Ali, Khalid Ibrahim, Zaid Ibrahim, Mat Taib, Kadir Sheikh Fazir, Chua Jui Meng.  

When they were in the BN you accused all of them of being corrupt. Now when they jump ship to PR do you seriously expect people to believe that they have suddenly become "clean as a white sheet" angels?

One of the key issues raised during the recent 13th general election was corruption. Although a section of these views, criticisms and allegations did not have a strong basis or were merely perceptions, these were used as grounds to allege that the Government is not transparent, clean and does not have integrity. 

HERE is the Press statement by the Consultation and Prevention Panel of Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission  (MACC) recently. This panel is of the opinion that it is imperative for the Government to take into account all views, criticisms and allegations from various quarters on this issue. 

 

To name some of the proposals;

 

1. Family Members of Cabinet Ministers, Deputy Ministers, Menteri Besar, Chief Ministers and State Executive Councillors Be Barred from Bidding for Government  contracts. 

2. Declaration of Assets Once in Every Three Years to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission ( MACC).

Nevertheless, here's the proposal to those Chinese who voted oppositions who shouted for A FREE MALAYSIA FROM CORRUPTION by Tuan Syed and Im sure agreed by other races and the majority race ie Malay;

 

So make a vow that you will NEVER pay a single sen in corruption money to any Civil Servant. Just make a sacred vow, in your mother'a name, your father's name, in the name of your ancestors etc - that you will NEVER pay even one sen in corruption to any Policeman or to any Government servant.   Even if they torture you, even if they tie your hands and roast you over the fire you will NEVER belanja minum, belanja karaoke, belanja shopping for any Policeman or Government servant.

 

Till you do that and walk your talk.... Ill agree to your every notion that Chinese vote the Oppposition merely because they want a Malaysia thats free from corruption.

 

Please inform us, when can we have this sacred vow .... time and place! 

PEMBANGKANG TAK BACA PERKARA 118???

Rakyat perlu tahu, Perkara 118 Perlembagaan Persekutuan menyebut dengan jelas, mana-mana pihak yang tidak bersetuju dengan keputusan pilihanraya boleh memfailkan petisyen pilihanraya di Mahkamah Tinggi.

Pada 5 Mei yang lepas melalui Pilihanraya Umum ke-13 (PRU-13) 85% rakyat telah buat keputusan melalui peti undi di bawah sistem pilihanraya yang berlandaskan kepada perlembagaan negara.

Semua undang-undang pilihanraya telah dibukukan dan dibaca oleh semua cerdik pandai di negara ini. Baik peguam mahupun pemimpin politik semua membaca buku yang sama.

Jika mana-mana pihak  tidak puashati dengan keputusan pilihanraya dan mahu mempertikaikannya, undang-undang juga menyebut, gunakanlah saluran undang-undang, iaitu mahkamah. (rujuk Artikel 118).

Lepas 21 hari keputusan diwartakan, kumpulkan bukti, bariskan segala peguam yang terbaik, berhujahlah di mahkamah daripada meraung memekik sana sini kata tak puashati dengan keputusan.

Apa akan jadi kepada proses demokrasi di negara kalau pemimpin-pemimpin politik yang sebegini rupa mengajar  rakyat, generasi muda kita melanggar undang-undang. Sepatutnya pemimpin bimbing mereka supaya mematuhi undang-undang…

Pilihanraya telah selesai dan rakyat telah membuat keputusan. 

Yang kalah tetap kalah dan yang menang tetap menang!

The Harrowing Experience of being an EC/SPR Officer for GE13 by Joanne Lim (Notes) on Monday, 6 May 2013 at 21:48

  

Contrary to public perception, most of the EC officers in schools are civilians/teachers who applied for the job to be EC officers on election day. I applied for the job as I wanted to be a part of the election process and gain a first-hand experience of one of the most exciting events in my beloved country. And of course, what better way to ensure a clean and fair election than to be a part of it?

To my utter shock, many voters regarded me as a government machinery who was placed there to prevent them from voting/to destroy/track their votes. When checking for a man’s saluran using his IC, I was about to hand him the paper which merely stated the room he should vote in when he quickly said, “NO NO! Don’t give me anything! You’ll track me!” It was flabbergasting!

Voters thought we EC officers had the power to summon everything. Our centre asked MBPJ (in charge of us) for wheelchairs but were told that they had ran out of wheelchairs. People scolded us for having no wheelchairs, but really, that was completely, absolutely not our fault. We asked for wheelchairs numerous times, but we never got it. To be fair to MBPJ, their staff looked harassed and exhausted each time we saw them (they ate, slept and worked in their centre round the clock few weeks prior to elections). I could imagine the number of phone calls they received that day as polling centres with problems called them for assistance. In the end we carried chairs from classrooms so that the senior citizens could sit in line and I drove senior citizens who walked in the school to the doorstep of their saluran. And I'm sorry about the sun, we can't help it if you have to queue in the sun, really we can't. We ourselves suffered in the heat, at least you could go home after voting.

One voter rudely asked me why she had to vote in a different saluran from her mother. She lamented about the inconvenience of it all and demanded that I change it. What she (and many others) failed to understand was that we were merely following a pre-decided electoral roll which had already placed everyone into various salurans according to your IC number. Saluran 1 started with the oldest voters on the list, Saluran 6 had the youngest voters.

Yes, changing your saluran is possible, we did it for a number of disabled/injured voters who couldn’t climb up staircases. But the paperwork involved in that is not easy, with clerks in both salurans involved having to co-ordinate and fill in forms. So what, you’ll think. That’s what you are paid for! Well, there are only 5-6 EC officers in each room, each time an EC officer is held up by such paperwork the entire voting process is delayed.We (and you) want to prevent fraud and cheating, hence paperwork is extremely necessary. You think it’s just a matter of you casting your vote in another classroom? The number of ballot papers provided for each saluran has already been fixed, any discrepancies and we’ll be in trouble.

Voters brought in their own pencils and erasers and whatnot and left them behind. We had a case of a voter who insisted that she had used a pencil to mark her vote (although we provided pens that were tied to the tables to prevent theft) because it was on the table. EC officers went to check the table and found no trace of a pencil. We asked the polling agents (PACA) if they had seen a pencil and they said no. For your information, every saluran has numerous agents from political parties who are monitoring the entire voting process. Finally the KTM (Ketua Tempat Mengundi) of that saluran came out and assured the voter that her vote would be counted, whether in pen or pencil.

The voter (and her friends/family) then said we would erase her vote and change it. To which the KTM replied by saying that all the votes would be counted in front of counting agents (PACA - who are placed there to monitor the counting process). By this time the voter and her friends/family are extremely hostile, bad-mannered, rude and sarcastic towards us. One older man shouts, “Who’s in charge of this now? The government? The government again lah!” A young man crudely and rudely tells us not to mess around with them. Trust me, I had to dig deep into my patience reserve bank to control my response towards them. The KTM gave the voter a form to make an official complaint but she decided to walk off.

The internet has done a lot of good, but plenty of harm too. Voters were told to look out for dots on their ballot papers which would result in their votes being considered “spoilt”. With the misconception that each centre was given 10% extra ballot papers, people kept demanding for new ballot papers the moment they saw a single tiny dot on their paper. Truth is, centres were given only a FEW extra ballot papers for voters who sincerely, accidentally messed up their ballot papers. In my centre, each saluran was only give 6-10 extra ballot papers although they had 500-600 voters per saluran. Don’t blame us if you found the EC officer refusing to give an extra ballot paper, do you want to deny someone else the right to vote on the basis of a single dot on your ballot paper?

Ok, time to bring in the PACAs (polling & counting agents) who were present in every saluran, monitoring and tracking the vote-counting process. Did you agents fight over a dot on the ballot paper? (Heck, most of you were watching from too far away to even see the names of candidates properly, what more a dot.) All the agents looked for were clear votes, whether in pen, pencil, or even indelible ink (yes, a number of voters thought they had to use the ink to make their vote). As long as it was a clear vote, it was accepted. If there were any disputes, agents would argue over it, defending their own parties. Having observed the counting process myself, I saw no instance of ballot papers being analysed for dots that would render it “spoilt”. And I’m sure most of us know friends/family who volunteered as PACAs, ask them themselves. Were you guys/gals looking out for dots?

I had another voter who stormed up to me and wanted to make an “official complaint”. He was aghast that the SPR stamp was stamped right on the centre of the perforated part of his ballot paper, resulting in the stamp being torn into half. I explained to him that this was done for the purpose of ensuring that no ballot paper was simply torn out of the ballot book. He then demanded to know why there was a serial number on his ballot paper. I explained that it was for the purpose of ensuring that all ballot papers were accounted for. In the event of a sudden discrepancy in the number of ballot papers (say, saluran X should only have 452 voters according to the records of both the polling agents and also EC officers but we suddenly count 634 ballot papers), the serial number was important in ensuring that only the “rightful” ballot papers were counted. He thought for a few seconds over my explanation, nodded and said, “This sounds like a much more plausible explanation,” and went off. I understand his worries, I myself have received many emails telling me how and where and what should be done on my ballot paper. I think that people must be educated on the entire election process to prevent this sort of paranoia.

Indelible ink? People came up to me complaining about the indelible ink being delible (haha). I’m sorry, I’m only an EC officer who assists you in voting. I did NOT make nor order nor buy the ink, and I most certainly do not know WHY the indelible ink is delible. Really, I’m just someone on duty to help you out! (If you must hear my oh-so-important-EC-Officer opinion, I find the whole business of indelible ink ludicrous anyhow, so I really do not care if it can be washed/Cloroxed/soaped/licked off.)

Read me clearly: HELP. I laughed watching the policemen on duty at the school gate. All they had to do was direct people to the correct rooms and manage traffic. I heard a policeman say in frustration, “Saya nak tolong kamu lah! Bukan nak tangkap you! (I just want to help you! Not arrest you!)” This is because he asked to see the printed slips of the voters so he could direct them to their rightful salurans, but they thought that he was preventing them from voting. I talked to many policemen since they too were regarded with suspicion, making them my allies. I found out aplenty about the lives of policemen, got to ask stupid questions like why they weren’t carrying guns, and what they would do if they encountered trouble on election day. We both lamented over our rumbling tummies when both the MBPJ and Police Department failed to send us food until 3pm. I managed to dig out some water bottles from somewhere in the school and passed it out to the policemen who were standing under the scorching sun the whole day. Look, I’m including this just to let you know that we are merely humans beings. I'm certain the police force was fully mobilised on that day. I talked to them and found out that they were on duty from 4am-6am THE NEXT DAY. 26 hours of duty, my fellow Malaysians. By night most of them had bloodshot eyes. They earned my absolute respect and admiration on that day.

I understand your paranoia, but we’re trying to be nice here, at least try and see that?? I detest how anger is so blinding that we take it out on others.

Giving money for your vote. We had voters who sought EC officers out, demanding that we give them money for voting. Seriously, I’m not kidding. There was even one voter who told us that she would vote if someone gave her money. Then she proceeded to sit around waiting the whole day. Haha, no one gave her any money. Another man came and demanded that we pay him for voting. I explained that we were EC officers, that it was an EC booth. He told me that every other voting centre had places to collect money, all except my centre. I shrugged and told him to approach the other centres then. He complained for a while more and left, telling us he would be back. Thankfully, he never returned.

PACAs. Some of the PACAs whom I met were pretty sarcastic and hostile towards us. They were sarcastic when they found out we were being paid for being on duty, told us not to forget that it was the “rakyat’s money”. They made fun of the free t-shirts and caps that we were wearing, again reminding us that it was THEIR money. They persistently told us that they were volunteers and received no money for doing their jobs. Ok, so I was paid RM235.00 for my duty. I worked from 5am to 9pm. I was drenched in rain, sweat, hatred and anger the entire day. You think it was worth it? We were given a small, tiny packet of meehoon for breakfast (seriously, it was about 4 mouthfuls) and one bottle of drink that was so sweet it made us thirsty. Since the canteen was closed and we couldn’t go out, many of us had no water to drink until our ‘lunch’ came at 3pm. Even then, somehow they constantly miscalculated the number of EC officers in our centre and a few of us had no food to eat. I had to take water bottles from the teachers’ staffroom as some of the teachers/EC officers had stashes of THEIR OWN (not government, please) water bottles. The PACAs had KFC and nice lunches from their own parties, they had the freedom to leave and buy their own water and food if they so desired, they took turns being on duty. Why bother comparing? If you envy my job so much, do apply to be an EC officer for the next GE. It’s open to all as long as you’re above 21 years old.

One PACA even had the audacity to tell me that I should “also read” non-state-controlled media to “find out the real happenings” in our country. Hey, just because I wasn’t explicitly supporting political parties doesn’t mean I’m an ignorant fool, ok?? As an EC officer my task was to be as neutral as possible, not to join in campaigning. I pointedly ignored that PACA because… well, because I’ve no energy nor time to deal with such narrow-minded mindsets.

We had PACA’s who came without their proper documents and then kicked up a big fuss and complained to SPR that we weren’t letting them in the rooms. I understand that some/many people had bad experiences with EC Officers, but after a whole day of such a hostile environment, who can blame them? By 10am the hostility I was receiving was taking a toll on my nerves! Many people pointedly ignored us, and at the end of the day, a PACA asked my Penyelia Pusat Mengundi (PPM), “You are a teacher? Not an SPR staff? All the KTMs are teachers too??” I could see confusion written all over her face, and she became friendly after that. -__-

No, I don’t hate PACAs. Erm… maybe I did, for a few hours. Yes, observe me by all means, but do it politely, keep all snide comments to yourself. I never once insulted any PACA (in fact, I introduced some of the PACA’s to the Penyelia Pusat Mengundi and I assisted them in what ways I could). I too could have pointedly ignored you for wanting to observe all that I do, but I did not. That being said, there were also PACAs who conducted themselves professionally.

And to the political party that dropped off the old uncle to vote and LEFT HIM THERE, may you receive your comeuppance someday (to put it politely. I have a much more vulgar sentence in mind). I never did ask which political party did it, but I do know that it’s darn irresponsible of them. I helped this old uncle who REALLY wanted to vote but could only move about 5cm each step, drove him from his voting room to a waiting area after he voted. I went outside and asked a nearby political barung if they had dropped him off, they merely laughed at me and asked, “Which party does he support?” I was utterly disgusted by their attitude and walked off. Finding a taxi was a near impossible task, didn’t see any. In the end the old uncle sat for a good two hours, got all wet from the storm (strong wind although he was sitting under a tent) till a taxi was found. I wanted to send him back, I did. But EC officers are not allowed to leave centres, and obviously so long as no one knew who he had voted for no one wanted to send him back. My heart really broke for this old man… I felt so guilty that I had failed to help him… I left him with other officers and did work elsewhere.

Really, to hell with humanity, I have to say. In our bid for free and fair elections we leave out compassion and love for others.

I’m unsure if there were real EC staff on duty in polling centres, but most schools I know hired everyday civilians like you and I. If the officers were strict, they were merely following orders from the higher-ups. The counting process was done in front of PACAs in each saluran, so cheating there is impossible. How does cheating happen? Definitely not at such a low-down level, if not they would not be hiring people like me to assist in the process. I believe fraud can only happen much higher up, at top-secret levels.

Ultimately, choosing to be an EC officer was a pretty abusive experience. Yes, there were people who were nice and smiled at us, but if there were any problems (real or imaginary) they turned hostile in a split second. I thought I would do my part in assisting out with ensuring a clean(er) election, but after everything, I’m not sure if it was worth it. The pay was definitely not worth it, but I was supposed to do it for the passion. No one told me I would be so badly mistreated for this job.

Will I do it again? Funnily enough, I may consider going through this again. Why? Despite it all, my purpose still remains: I love my country and I want to contribute towards ensuring clean and fair elections.

Note: I did not expect this post to gain such popularity, please bear in mind that the experience I had speaks for myself alone. I'm not speaking on behalf of PACA, EC, MBPJ, the police, the government, etc. This is merely my own, individual experience and I shared it in hope of enlightening the rakyat for future GEs.